After change
After a reorg
New shape, same people. Trust and ownership get re-litigated quietly.
Team Execution Diagnostic
Your team's. In 3 minutes.
Seven questions. One honest read of the operating system your team actually runs on, not how it looks on paper.
7
Dimensions
3 min
To complete
1
Honest read
The problem
Talented people inside systems that create friction, politics, and decision drag. Roadmaps slip. Everyone stays busy. Outcomes stay average. The root cause is rarely strategy. It's the execution system underneath.
How it works
Seven focused questions about how your team really works, not how it looks on paper.
Get your team’s operating pattern: where it’s holding, where it’s losing energy, and what’s unspoken.
Get concrete micro-actions you can test in the next two weeks. No generic advice. No fluff.
What you get
Your team’s named identity. The pattern actually driving results.
Where your system holds and where it bleeds energy.
The tensions nobody talks about in meetings.
Specific moves to test in the next two weeks.
Who this is for
You see the org chart. This shows you the operating system underneath it, the one your team actually runs on.
You feel the friction every week. This names what you already sense but struggle to articulate in a leadership meeting.
You built the strategy. This shows you if the execution system can carry it, or if it's quietly working against you.

16 years inside Deutsche Telekom. Teams across eight time zones, the same pattern repeating: great teams stalling for reasons nobody could say out loud. I help leaders surface what's quietly in the way. Silent Signal is that read in 3 minutes. Seven questions, one honest look at the system your team actually runs on.
Connect on LinkedInWhen teams run the signal
None of them are on a calendar. Every one is a leader knowing something is off.
After change
New shape, same people. Trust and ownership get re-litigated quietly.
After loss
What did they hold together that nobody named until now?
After a quiet quarter
Effort was high, output was low. The bottleneck is rarely capacity.
Before a cycle
Walk in with a read on what the team can actually carry.
Quiet signal
Everyone in the room already knows. They just need a way to say it.
≈ 7 in 10
of teams here already show a red or amber signal
150+
teams calibrated against this version of the engine
Energy and Feedback
the two dimensions where teams quietly bleed capacity
Numbers stabilise after the first 25 calibrated assessments. We round so the page doesn't twitch.
The framework
Do people know what matters this quarter, or are they optimizing for different things?
Can people say the uncomfortable thing in the room, or does it come out later on Slack?
When something slips, does anyone own it, or does it become a conversation about process?
Do decisions get made, or do they get discussed until someone loses interest?
Do people show up switched on, or is there a low-grade exhaustion that nobody mentions?
Does the team ship things that matter, or is it busy without being productive?
Does the team actually talk about what’s not working, or do reviews come once a year?
Each dimension measured on a 1–7 scale. Results cross-referenced for contradictions.
This doesn't measure how your team feels.
It reads how your team operates.
The difference is what most diagnostics miss.
Ready?
Seven questions. One honest read. Free, anonymous, and takes three minutes.
No signup. No credit card. Just signal.